
Sarah Selby
An experienced practitioner in all aspects of serious crime,
particularly complex prosecution work.
YEAR OF CALL 1998
Education
BA (Hons) Law, University of Cambridge (1st class)
Inns of Court School of Law (BVC)
BPP Law School (QLTT)
Awards
W.M. Tapp Postgraduate Scholarship
Kalisher Scholarship Essay Prize
Appointments
CPS Advocate Panel
CPS Rape and Serious Sexual Offences List
CPS Specialist Fraud Panel
CPS Serious Crime Panel
Previously appointed to the Attorney-General’s Unified List of Approved Counsel
Memberships
Criminal Bar Association
South Eastern Circuit
Overview of Practice
Sarah has a wide-ranging and established criminal practice (both prosecuting and defending), but with an emphasis on serious prosecution work: particularly large-scale and complex fraud cases; rape and other serious sexual offences; multi-handed homicide / violence / weapons offences; conspiracies to import, produce and supply controlled drugs; and driving offences resulting in death or serious injury. She is particularly adept at the detailed analysis and clear presentation of complex evidence, and is experienced in conducting sensitive cases involving young and otherwise vulnerable witnesses and defendants.
In addition to her CPS work (as an approved rape prosecutor and on the specialist fraud and serious crime panels) Sarah is often instructed to advise on and prosecute cases for other agencies, including HM Revenue & Customs, the Department for Work and Pensions, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills / DTI (as was), various Local Authorities and the Probation Service. She is experienced in the areas of Insolvency Act offences; health and safety, food hygiene, noise nuisance and environmental offences; benefits frauds; Education Act cases; and other offences prosecuted by local authorities.
Sarah’s defence practice is equally varied, and she is regularly instructed in cases of particular complexity and sensitivity (including serious dishonesty, violence, drugs and sexual offending). She is experienced in representing young and vulnerable defendants, and in cases involving issues of fitness to plead / stand trial.
Sarah has spent an extended period on secondment to the Financial Conduct Authority: working on the investigation and prosecution of suspected offences of market manipulation / abuse and fraudulent trading, regarding a ‘pump and dump’ share scheme operated by those running a public limited company. She also spent two periods on full-time secondment to the (then) Revenue & Customs Prosecutions Office: conducting large-scale disclosure reviews in a series of drugs, fraud and money laundering cases, involving predominantly intelligence-led investigations and extensive PII issues.
Sarah is experienced in the conduct of high-value / complex confiscation proceedings and other ancillary orders, and her civil work includes cash forfeiture and condemnation proceedings.
Practice Areas
Fraud:
Sarah is regularly instructed to prosecute and defend high-value and complex fraud cases, which are often multi-handed and require thorough and focused preparation. As a member of the CPS Specialist Fraud Panel (and previously as counsel instructed by the Revenue & Customs Prosecutions Office) she has prosecuted many large-scale VAT and direct tax frauds, cases of duty evasion and cheating the revenue, dishonesty offences by persons in positions of trust, and money laundering offences. Sarah is also experienced in prosecuting substantial benefits frauds (for the Department for Work and Pensions) and Insolvency Act offences (for the former Department for Business, Innovation and Skills / DTI). She is adept at the effective management and clear presentation of document heavy cases, dealing with the extensive disclosure exercises that are often involved, and conducting the substantial confiscation proceedings which flow from such prosecutions.
For further details please see the Fraud & Financial Regulation section.
Sexual Offences:
Sarah both prosecutes and defends serious sexual offences, including rape, familial offences and historic allegations. As an experienced prosecutor on the CPS RASSO List she regularly conducts cases of considerable gravity and sensitivity, often involving young and vulnerable witnesses (with the use of appropriate special measures including intermediaries) and complex disclosure issues (particularly in relation to third-party material).
Sarah also has extensive experience of cases involving indecent images of children (including those with complex technical evidence regarding the digital images / electronic devices in question); prosecutions arising from the use of undercover police officers and others posing as children online in order to identify sex offenders; and cases involving large-scale brothel keeping and the laundering of the significant proceeds thereof.
Recent prosecutions of note include: a serial rapist who targeted, robbed and violently attacked five lone women as they left the public transport system at night, subjecting them to repeated rapes / sexual assaults; a previously convicted murderer who was targeted by vigilante ‘paedophile hunters’ posing as children, who then attempted to blackmail the defendant as a result of the sexual offences he committed; a defendant charged with rape who suffered from parasomnia, and who claimed to have penetrated the complainant whilst he was asleep; and an 80-year-old defendant who sexually assaulted children as young as seven, but was unfit to plead by the time of trial due to complex cognitive disorders.
Defence cases of note include: a British mother charged with sexually abusing her young children whilst in Northern Cyprus (having fled there in order to avoid care proceedings in the UK), after her apparent unlawful ‘deportation’ back to this country by Cypriot authorities. An extensive abuse of process hearing examined the role of the National Crime Agency and Foreign & Commonwealth Office in the circumvention of extradition procedures by the police/judicial systems in TRNC and the Republic of Cyprus, which had resulted in the defendant’s forcible return to the UK and subsequent prosecution. Also defending, Sarah successfully appealed a conviction for sexual assault regarding the application of s.41 of the YJCEA 1999 to previous (potentially false) allegations of rape by a complainant: R v AM [2009] EWCA Crim 618; [2010] Crim.L.R. 792 – an authority cited in both Archbold and Blackstone’s.
Drugs/Violence:
Sarah regularly prosecutes and defends cases involving homicide, serious non-fatal violence and weapons offences. Recent examples include: the defence of a young gang member charged with murdering a member of a rival gang and stabbing another associate, following a sustained campaign of violence between gangs; the prosecution of five defendants for conspiring to possess a firearm with intent to endanger life, regarding an incident where live ammunition was discharged into a family home; the defence of a young man who caused serious head injuries to another in an unprovoked attack, after which the victim took his own life; and the prosecution of a defendant who stabbed a retail worker in an apparent homophobic attack, having warned authorities that he had stopped taking his antipsychotic medication.
Sarah also prosecutes and defends large-scale conspiracies to import, produce and supply controlled drugs, often involving multiple defendants and detailed surveillance, telephone and electronic evidence. She is experienced in dealing with the complex disclosure and PII issues that arise in such cases. Recent cases of note include: the prosecution of eight defendants involved in a substantial and sophisticated County Lines operation, a number of whom had received NRM referrals as potential victims of modern slavery; the defence of an individual charged with couriering large quantities of Class A drugs for a national network of Organised Crime Groups, who asserted duress by those running the operation; the prosecution of five defendants for conspiring to supply large quantities of cocaine from one OCG to another, whilst disguising the purity of those drugs and utilising encrypted phones and a loaded firearm; and the prosecution of six defendants for repeatedly importing vast quantities of Cannabis into the UK under cover of a legitimate business, following an extensive surveillance operation by the NCA.
Sarah is also experienced in conducting cases involving allegations of child cruelty, child abduction and the ill-treatment / neglect of those lacking capacity; offences of blackmail, arson and criminal damage with intent to endanger life; and driving offences resulting in death and serious injury (often involving complex technical evidence and issues of causation).
Recent prosecutions of note include: a defendant with connections to a foreign art dynasty, who fraudulently obtained almost £1.4 million by purporting to broker the international sale of a valuable sculpture; a Member of the European Parliament who fraudulently claimed over £100,000 in parliamentary expenses over a number of years, by repeatedly submitting falsified documents in order to enrich both himself and family members; three defendants who defrauded multiple elderly victims of over £1 million by the sophisticated marketing and selling of overvalued investment products; and the theft by an accountant of £1.2 million from a residents’ association, involving a number of vulnerable victims and complex confiscation proceedings concerning hidden assets.
Notable defence cases include: a bank employee accused of defrauding an elderly customer of £100,000; an NHS employee accused of defrauding her employers of over £400,000; and a former BNY Mellon employee charged with theft of the bank’s computer equipment and laundering the proceeds of an online personal services fraud.
Sarah is experienced in cases involving the fraudulent evasion of border controls, having prosecuted many offences concerning the illegal entry of foreign nationals into the UK (via both small boats and freight vehicles) and the smuggling of prohibited / restricted / dutiable goods. Sarah was also instructed by the CPS to conduct a large-scale review of disclosure in a prosecution originally brought by the Marine Management Organisation, regarding alleged illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing in West African coastal waters by a household name in the UK seafood industry.
Sarah is also experienced in conducting the enforcement proceedings which follow such confiscation orders. Of particular note was a case where a defendant petitioned for his own bankruptcy in an attempt to frustrate the enforcement of a confiscation order. After successfully opposing an application to stay those enforcement proceedings, Sarah was instructed by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills in the subsequent application for Judicial Review of the court’s decision: which involved an in-depth analysis of the effect of insolvency law on enforcement powers (and which she also successfully opposed).
Sarah has experience in the conduct of civil cash forfeiture proceedings, often involving significant sums (both in the Magistrates’ Court and on appeal to the Crown Court). She has also been instructed in condemnation proceedings involving high-value and large quantities of seized goods.
Sarah also acts for a number of local authorities in the prosecution of regulatory offences, including: health and safety, planning, environmental, noise nuisance, food hygiene, and trade mark offences. She has undertaken cases of considerable gravity and complexity within those spheres, often resulting in the imposition of significant penalties. Sarah is also experienced in defending such cases.
Notable Cases
R v Gratton & others (2022) – Junior for the prosecution in a five-handed conspiracy to possess a firearm with intent to endanger life, concerning a group plot to carry out a revenge shooting of an associate, but which resulted in live ammunition being discharged into a neighbouring family home.
R v Scott (2022) – Defence of a young man charged with repeatedly raping and sexually abusing a child family member over a 10-year period, the abuse having commenced when the victim was aged six and the defendant 14.
R v OA (2021) – Junior for the defence of a 17-year-old charged with the murder of a rival gang member, the separate stabbing of another individual and conspiracy to cause grievous bodily harm, following a prolonged feud between gangs. The case involved complex admissibility issues regarding alleged gang-related activity, and required an intermediary for the defendant as a result of speech and language difficulties.
R v Baballah (2020) – Junior for the prosecution of a serial rapist who targeted and violently attacked five lone women over an 11-day period, as they travelled home via the public transport network in the early hours of the morning (both robbing and raping them and subjecting them to repeated sexual assaults).
R v Csaholczi (2019) – Prosecution of a lorry driver for importing 74kg of cocaine (worth over £5 million) concealed within legitimate commercial consignments, involving complex and contested tachograph and foreign evidence.
R v Bradbury & others (2019) – Defence of a former Royal Marine charged with conspiring to covertly transport a number of illegal immigrants into the UK from Albania, and the unlawful possession of military grade ammunition.
R v Little (2019) – Junior for the defence of a mother charged with sexually abusing her young children for financial gain via adult websites, following her relocation to Northern Cyprus in order to evade care proceedings in the UK. An extensive abuse of process hearing examined the involvement of the UK authorities in the apparent unlawful deportation of the defendant from Northern Cyprus to the Republic of Cyprus and then on to the UK, in order to facilitate a domestic prosecution.
R v Han & others (2018) – Junior for the prosecution in a vast money laundering conspiracy by Chinese nationals both in London and abroad, involving the physical transfer and placement into the UK banking system of over £12 million in illicit cash.
R v Yeoh & others (2017) – Defence of a mother charged with laundering the proceeds of a sophisticated nationwide network of brothels, being operated by her daughter and numerous other individuals.
R v Byrne & another (2017) – Defence of a carer charged with the ill-treatment and neglect of an elderly patient who lacked capacity and who subsequently died, involving complex medical evidence as to causation.
R v Davies, Wilson & Ibrahim (2016) – Prosecution of a £1 million conspiracy to defraud, involving the selling of grossly overvalued investment products in rare earth metals to numerous elderly and otherwise vulnerable victims.
R v Goldbourne & others (2016) – Defence of an individual charged with conspiring to possess firearms with intent to endanger life, involving allegations of gang-related and organised crime.
R v Skinner (2016) – Junior for the prosecution of a British MEP who fraudulently claimed over £100,000 in expenses from the European Parliament over a number of years, by repeatedly submitting falsified documentation.
R v Jones, Jones & Oliver (2015) – Prosecution of defendants for wide-scale brothel keeping, money laundering and mortgage fraud, and cheating the Revenue in respect of £1.5 million of income generated by the enterprise.
R v Enstone & another (2015) – Defence of a young man charged with causing death and serious injury by dangerous driving, involving allegations of racing with the co-defendant (unknown to him at the time) and complex technical evidence.
R v Tyler (2015) – Prosecution of a defendant for causing death by careless driving during the course of his employment, involving conflicting technical evidence and complex issues of causation (the deceased being a Jehovah’s Witness who refused a blood transfusion).
R v Carlton & others (2014) – Junior for the prosecution in an eleven-handed case of prison mutiny within HMP Highdown, after inmates barricaded themselves inside a cell, set fires and claimed to have taken a hostage, before being forcibly removed by riot police.
R v Chowdhury, Chowdhury & Rai (2014) – Junior for the prosecution in a manslaughter case involving a violent attack that resulted in the drowning of a young victim.
R v Copsey (2014) – Prosecution of an accountant who stole £1.2 million from the residents of the luxury flats where he lived, involving a number of vulnerable victims and complex confiscation proceedings concerning extensive hidden assets.
R v Akerman & others (2014) – Defence of an ‘urban explorer’ charged with a wide-ranging conspiracy to commit criminal damage within subterranean premises owned by TfL; the prosecution being stayed as an abuse of process due to the flawed nature of the police investigation.
R v J & H (2013) – Prosecution of high-profile defendants jointly charged with raping a highly intoxicated complainant, involving complex issues of capacity and consent.
R v Abbas & others (2011) – Junior for the prosecution in a six-handed conspiracy to commit a series of armed robberies of commercial premises and cash-in-transit vehicles, involving the use of an inside man.
R v Fongho & Griffiths (2011) – Junior for the prosecution regarding allegations of forgery and misconduct in a public office by a British diplomat, concerning the issuing of UK work permits in the care sector.
R v Alagbaoso [2021] EWCA Crim 1997; [2021] 12 WLUK 474 – Appeal against conviction in a gang-related murder by a then 17-year-old, concerning a refusal by the trial judge to leave a verdict of manslaughter to the jury on the basis of either lack of intent or loss of control.
R v Foster & Others [2015] EWCA Crim 1824; [2016] 1 Cr.App.R.(S) 36 – Appeal against sentence in respect of the wide-scale forgery of documents by employees implementing a Government funded back–to-work scheme.
R v AM [2009] EWCA Crim 618; [2010] Crim.L.R. 792 – Appeal against conviction regarding the application of Section 41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 to previous (potentially false) rape allegations made by complainants in sex cases.
R v Smith (James William) [2006] EWCA Crim 1355 – Appeal against conviction concerning the detailed application of the bad character provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
NEWS STORIES
Mark Seymour leading Sarah Selby concluded the prosecution of a serial Rapist who engaged in a campaign of Rape in East London
FCsewAmi9bell2023-11-07T22:20:44+00:00February 7th, 2022|