R v Van Puyenbroek & Ors
(Op Solon)  EWCA Crim 1364, CA – Commendation received re conduct of PII/disclosure in multi-£m Class A lorry importation conspiracy.
R v Pepple  EWCA Crim, CA – Evidence of purported fresh evidence of Compl in Rape case having admitted to lying in evidence at the trial.
R v Drinkwater  1 Cr. App. R. 30, CA – Admissibility of evidence at instance of Defence re confession of deceased 3rd party to crime of which Def charged.
R v Dhall  EWCA Crim 1610, CA
R v Cortes Plaza  EWCA Crim 501, CA – Admissibility of evidence of single recent conviction for drugs importation as bad character in drugs importation/supply conspiracy.
R v Sakhizada  EWCA Crim 1036, CA – Standard of proof in confiscation proceedings where Crown rely on evidence of criminality outside the scope of the indictment.
R v Kapoor (Saran Singh)  2 Cr. App. R. 11, CA – Successfully demonstrated that immigration offence of which Def purportedly convicted in Crown Ct, did not exist in law.
R v Sixto  EWCA Crim 2615, CA – Admissibility of evidence re bad character of 3rd party pursuant to s100 CJA 2003.
R v Muia  EWCA Crim 332, CA – Causation in local authority confiscation proceedings.
R v Mileusnic  EWCA Crim 2298, CA – Directions to jury re falsity of documents relating to Def’s presence on vehicle used to import drugs to UK.
R v Murrell  EWCA Crim 382, CA: pre-CJA 2003 – Admissibility of evidence re bad character of Def at the instance of Co-Def.
WCC v FCUK Retail Ltd. (2005) 169 JP 321,  EWHC 933, DCt –
Regulation of noise pollution from storefront glass loudspeakers in a London street.
R v O’Brien  EWCA Crim 1370, CA DCt – Sufficiency of evidence re identification.
WCC v McDonald  EWHC Admin 2698, DC – Sufficiency of evidence of Local Authority Officers re noise nuisance.
R (Vickers) v West London Mags Ct (2003) 167 JP 473, DC – Availability of reasonable excuse in response to remand for breach of bail conditions.
R (on the application of Graham) v DPP  EWHC 120 (QB) – Sufficiency of evidence of Police Officers in prosecution for speeding.
R v Inner London Cr Ct, ex p. N & S  1 Cr. App. R. 343, DC – Factors to be taken into account in determining appropriate length of Detention and Training Order.
R v Condron  1 Cr. App. R. 185, CA – The first, and still the leading case, on adverse inferences from silence in interview pursuant to s34 CJPOA 1994.